Wednesday, December 16, 2009

MIDTERM STUDY GUIDE

Here is the midterm study guide...I encourage you to study early and often...The test will include 70 fill-in, multiple choice questions and two essay questions. I will provide three possible essay questions and you may choose to answer any two. The study guide below will note in blue font which material will be considered for possible essays. Words, sections, and phrases in red font are highlighted for easier study and should be noted. Have a blessed Christmas and a Happy New Year - See you all in 2010!!!


Study Guide

Two schools of thought exist today on the source of American liberty and freedom. The first, which was held by most for the first 150 years of our history, states that the source of our freedoms are in God and Biblical principles - man is given by God natural, inherent rights and governments are established not to give, but to guarantee those rights. The second school of thought is that the founders gathered their ideals from secular, Enlightenment, humanist sources and that human freedom is given by governments and men through reason, not by God. This view has become more prevalent in the last 80 years as humanist teachings have come into our schools and universities.

1. worldview - a belief system whereby one understands or interprets the world and interacts with it. A biblical worldview is one in which all of life is understood and lived on the facts, truth, and principles of Scripture.
2. secular - apart from religion/God
3. humanism - worldview that views man as the measure of all things. The concept of secular humanism is a belief system that denies the reality of God and absolute truth while exalting man and his own abilities and relative truth and knowledge as all that is needed.
4. natural law/rights - legal theory that states that law is set and rights are guaranteed by that which is natural or inherent (within) the nature of man and applies to all human beings. Theists hold that these natural law/rights are given by God while atheists hold that these concepts are simply natural to mankind as a result of their humanity alone and are a product of natural evolutionary causes.
5. positive law - legal theory that states that law is set and rights are given by human beings alone and are based on individual belief and circumstances.
6. absolute truth - belief that Truth exists which is derived from God, eternal, and applies to all people in all circumstances and situations.
7. moral relativism - belief that moral truth is not absolute, but relative, changing according to personal opinion, circumstance, and situation. Derived from the mind and reason of man alone and not to God.
8. divine law - law derived from God, independent of the will and opinion of man. Allies to all people everywhere at all times.
9. unalienable - that which cannot be taken away justly. Refers to rights and freedoms given by the Creator in the Declaration of Independence (life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness)
10. alienable - that which can be taken away. Refers to guarantees that are govern by man/government - while important, they can and do change or can and are taken away.
11. civil rights/liberties - rights and freedoms given by civil authorities/government. These rights and freedoms protect the individual from unfair governmental practices and guarantee equality under law. Because they are given by man, these guarantees are alienable.
12. Rex Lex - ancient doctrine stating that the king is law - absolutely in power and control - the king is nor bound by law, but is above the law and makes and applies law to his subjects/slaves as he decrees. Upholds idea that some are by nature better than others, that equality under God and law does not exist, and that God appoints some to rule over others without their consent based on his choice - the divine right of kings.
13. Lex Rex - political concept first put forth by Samuel Rutherford in 1644, stating that the law is king. The teaching states that the law is absolutely in power and control - the king, subjects, and slaves are all under the authority of the law. Upholds biblical idea that all are created equal in the sight of God
14. materialism - belief that the only thing that exists is matter and that all matter, phenomena, and causes are natural. Matter is the only substance - there is no spiritual aspect to life and no supernatural.
15. theism - belief in God (from Greek theos - God)
16. atheism - belief in no God (a- no; theos - God)
17. deism - belief that God created all things, then withdrew from his creation and allowed all things to operate by natural process. Belief that God does not intervene directly in the lives of individuals or in creation itself.
18. monotheism - belief in one God
19. polytheism - belief in many gods
20. pantheism - belief that God or gods are in all things and as such creation itself or that which is natural should be worshipped.
21. social compact - idea that government structure should be based on a concept that those in authority are placed in that position by the consent of the governed. Government is of, by, and for the people
22. federalism - system of government whereby power is given by the consent and elective choice of the people and divided from a federal or central power to a state and then a local authority. In addition to this separation of power, each level of government is then broken into branches (legislative, executive, and judicial) of power and responsibility. As a result, power is checked and balanced so that power is limited. More than anything else, the founders feared unlimited, unchecked power and tried to limit power as much as possible.
23. legislative branch - makes the law
24. executive branch - enforces the law
25. judicial branch - interprets the law
26. religious freedom clause of first amendment - ‘Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion or prohibit the free exercise thereof’
27. The first part of the clause is known as the establishment clause. The second part of the clause is known as the free exercise clause
28. Separation of church and state - concept first written by Thomas Jefferson in a private letter to a Baptist congregation in Danbury, Conn. advocating a wall of separation between church and state. Jefferson’s original idea and the purpose of the first amendment was to guarantee religious freedom by not allowing the federal government (and he hoped state governments eventually also) to touch it in any way. This concept is now used to separate church/religion from many areas of life and culture by law.
29. Declaration of Independence - established government on basis of ideals founded in Judeo-Christian worldview. Written primarily by Thomas Jefferson, but he drew from many sources and wanted it to be ’an expression of the American mind,” a summary of what Americans thought as a whole. It asserted that: 1. law and rights are established in God 2. Equality and justice for all under all is possible because all men are created equal in the eyes of God. 3. Natural law and rights are given to all by God as gifts and thus are unalienable (cannot be taken away rightly) It was to be a government of laws, not men. 4. The purpose of government is not to give, but to guarantee and secure these rights
5. If government fails to do this, it is the right and the duty of the people to change their government to secure these rights 6. Governments are established and maintain power through the consent of the governed, not by force.
30. US Constitution - 1. established a representative form of government based in law upon the ideals stated in the Declaration. 2. Established government of, by, and for the people - power is vested in the people. 3. The people agree or consent to be governed by elected representatives under a federal system of federal, state, and local levels. Separate branches are established to further divide power and responsibilities 4. Equal justice under law is guaranteed and the Constitution is the supreme law of the land. 5. Established a system of checks and balances and separation of powers to create a limit on governmental power.

Thomas Jefferson - the chief author of the Declaration of Independence - the ‘pen’ of the revolution

John Adams - the chief spokesman for independence at the Second Continental Congress - the ‘voice’ of independence.

John Dickinson - delegate to the Second Continental Congress from Pennsylvania. Dickinson opposed declaring independence at the time because he feared that the colonists were throwing away their rights as Englishmen and that they were not able to stand against the full might of Great Britain.

Jefferson and Adams both died on July 4, 1826, 50 years to the day after the formal passage of the Declaration of Independence

Thomas Paine - author of Common Sense, a 46 page pamphlet that sold 150,000 copies - it’s goal was to convince the colonies that independence was the right course to take and that unity was needed if they were going to win their independence. The power of his argument turned many to support independence in the days just before the Declaration of Independence was approved

Societies governed by a biblical worldview WILL produce freedom with form - liberty within a structure of laws and responsibilities under God and based on eternal law and Truth the result = Freedom!

Societies governed by a humanist worldview WILL produce chaos and slavery - moral relativism will create a society with laws and rights based on the power and will of the state - power will be corrupted and abused and chaos and disregard for authority will be created ( lawlessness and anarchy) This WILL lead to an acceptance of more and eventually TOTAL power being brought to bear on all of society (totalitarianism) The result = Slavery!

Some of the founders were Christian believers, but virtually ALL of the founders had a great respect for Biblical principles and knew that they were founding their freedoms, rights, and government on Biblical principles and truth. In 1776, 99% of the American people identified themselves as being Christian - the Christian worldview prevailed throughout society and culture.

Humanists have used a strategy to transform America’s foundation from a Biblical worldview to a Humanist worldview. To do this, they have: 1. taken control of the educational system and established a humanist curriculum 2. Used laws and court decisions to restrict religious freedom and promote humanistic values 3. Spread their humanist beliefs through media and entertainment and 4. Spread their humanist beliefs in certain churches, causing some churches to adopt a humanistic philosophy

Between 1620 and 1787, the colonies established over 100 government charters written as social compacts of community based on Christian principles with God as witness to their actions and commitments.

The Declaration of Independence established, for the first time in world history, a concept of universal, God - given, natural rights

Jefferson stated that the declaration was not based on his opinions and beliefs alone, but summarized the sentiments and beliefs of all of the American people. He called it , "an expression of the American mind."

The population of the colonies in 1776 was approximately 3 million, 99% of whom were protestant Christians. The concepts of freedom, equality, independence from unfair or tyrannical earthly power, and dependence upon God and His Truth came directly from Christian principles and the religious excitement and spiritual movement known as the First Great Awakening. This movement of God occurred in the colonies between roughly 1730-1760

The founders knew that they were establishing ideals and forms of government rooted in God, absolute truth, and universal, natural law. Their understandings were impacted by ancient writers and governments and by reason; however, the founding of America was certainly NOT based upon a concept of secular humanism, polytheism, pantheism, atheism, or the beliefs of Islam. Any support for a secular society and government was totally foreign to public beliefs at the time of the founding.

The Bible teaches that Jesus Christ is Lord of ALL of life, including politics and government. In Romans 13, the Bible calls for men to be mindful and respectful of authority; however, if the law and will of man is not in obedience to the law and will of God, it is the obligation of man to resist unjust law. (ex. Moses, Daniel and his three friends, Peter and John, the early church, etc...)

The founders believed that the key to freedom was to limit power and to promote religion and morality

To limit power, the founders:

1. created a system of federalism that divided power vertically between federal, state, and local governments. There are over 80,ooo separate governments in the US today.
2. divided power horizontally into three branches of power and responsibility - executive, legislative, and judicial. This is known as the concept of separation of powers.
3. established the ability and responsibility of branches to check and balance on another in many different areas. Examples of this include: The executive branch appoints judges, but the legislative branch must approve the appointments. The legislative branch makes the laws, but the executive veto or nullify the proposed law. The legislative branch can then override the executive ceto with a 2/3 vote of both houses of Congress.
4. A bicameral (two houses) Congress was established to distribute state power and to create a system whereby proposed laws would move slowly through the Congress, allowing for debate and amendments.
5. the federalist system was designed to limit central power and give most authority to state and local governments and provide maximum individual liberty.
6. A Bill of Rights was established in the US Constitution to guarantee these individual rights and liberties and to limit central power. The US Constitution would not have been ratified by 3/4 of the states had the founders not promised to include a Bill of Rights. The Bill of Rights, the first ten amendments to the Constitution, was approved by the very first Congress (1791)
7. The Constitution allows for changes or amendments if needed - the process is difficult, but not impossible. The Constitution has 27 amendments (out of over 10,000 proposed). 2/3 of both houses of Congress must vote for a proposed amendment and 3/4 of the states must ratify.
8. Frequent elections were established on all levels to hold elected officials accountable to the public on a regular basis.
9. Stated that God, not government, is the source of natural and individual rights and liberty - Government is to be the guarantor of natural and individual rights. If it ever destroys or harms these rights, it is the duty of the people to oppose and change it.
10. The founders encouraged the promotion of religion and morality among the people because it restricted the natural sinful impulse of man to be selfish and corrupt. The greatest guarantor of religious liberty was the religious clauses of the first amendment.
The clauses had the same goal - to promote religious freedom and religious exercise and to limit governmental power over religion and conscience.

First Amendment religious clauses: "Congress (national legislature)shall make no law respecting an ESTABLISHMENT of religion, or prohibit the FREE EXERCISE thereof..."

Meaning: The FEDERAL Congress only was forbidden by law to be able to establish a national church. States could, and did, establish state churches - 9 of the colonies had established state churches by law in 1775 and others had tests of faith that people had to pass before being able hold elected office. These practices ended in all states by 1833 as the number of churches and denominations increased. The ending of these established churches and tests allowed for more religious freedom, diversity, and practice. The original intent of both religious clauses of the first amendment was to PROMOTE and encourage religious freedom by prohibiting the FEDERAL government form interfering in theses issues in ANY way. Thus, the clauses should not be in conflict with each other, but today, secularists have been able to change the original purpose and intent of the establishment clause through unwise court rulings and unwise laws. The establishment clause is now used on any and every type of religious expression, thus the establishment clause is being used to limit or restrict the free exercise of religion - this was never the intention - upholding one clause should not negate the other, but today, laws and court decisions are used in such a way as to secularize society as much as possible

All of the founders were not believing Christians, but ALL of them held a belief in the truths and teachings of a Christian worldview. They ALL agreed:

1. God created all men equal in value - all men were created in the image of God.
2. God gave to all men certain unalienable rights - natural rights endowed by the Creator.
3. The greatest of all individual rights was thre right to conscience - the ability to reflect upon and choose for oneself without limit on religious issues.
4. All men are by nature corrupt, selfish, sinful, and apt to abuse power.
5. Power must be limited in all civil institutions, church and state alike.
6. Good order and equal justice under law is a pillar of freedom (Lex Rex) Government should be one of laws, not men.
7. Religion, morality, and virtue are pillars of freedom - a secular state or nation could not long survive. To remove God and Christian principles from government and society would remove the limits upon power and lead to chaos and slavery.

US Constitution - established a republican form of government based in law and upon the foundation and ideals found in the Declaration of Independence. It is a federalist system based on a government of, by, and for the people. The people govern themselves through elected representatives. It is a government where power comes from the people - the government rules only by the consent or permission of the governed, not by force.

The first ruling document of the United States was not the Constitution with which we are familiar with today but the Articles Of Confederation. This latter document provided for a weaker central government than the Constitution. Among the prohibitions on Congress in the Articles of Confederation was that it did not provide Congress with the power to raise revenue through taxes. This power of taxation was left only to the States. In fact, the Congress had to rely solely on the goodwill of the states to provide revenue to the central government. So weak was this form of government that it was called merely a league of friendship, or confederation, among the states. In contrast to the weakness of the central government, the states were free to raise revenue in manners that could be often heavy-handed. This is what led to the Shays Rebellion.

Following the Revolutionary War, the United States faced severe economic hardships. One reason, in addition to war debt, was that the new nation was cut off from the commercial ties of the British Empire. Especially hard hit was Massachusetts because England cut off trade between the United States and the British West Indies. This severely harmed several businesses of that state such as shipbuilding, distilling, and lumber, which depended on the West Indies trade.

Because of the economic hard times in Massachusetts, many farms heavily in debt were seized by their creditors and often sold for a fraction of their value. The farmers and working men of Massachusetts who were unable to pay their debts were sent to debtor prisons and would not be released until their debts were paid. The state legislature of Massachusetts responded to this economic crisis in a very inadequate manner such as increasing court costs and raising taxes.

As a result, mobs of farmers and workers took matters into their own hands in August 1786 and barred access to the courts of several towns such as Pittsfield and Northampton. Among the important leaders of this rebellion was Daniel Shays, a Revolutionary War veteran from Pelham, and the rebellion came to be known as Shays Rebellion

Most of the acts by the rebels during Shays Rebellion were non-violent. In Great Barrington, the rebels released prisoners from jail and in Worcester they drafted a resolution stating their grievances. The only violence occurred on January 25, 1787 when Daniel Shays and his men attempted to seize a federal arsenal in Springfield to capture the weapons. The defending state militia in Springfield killed three of the rebels with cannon shot and caused them to quickly disperse. The rebels were captured in February and sentenced to death for treason but were subsequently pardoned.

The importance of Shays Rebellion was not so much the acts of rebellion themselves but how it pointed out the weakness of the Articles of Confederation for governing the United States. In order to prevent such anarchy in the future and to strengthen the central government, the Philadelphia Convention convened to draft the Constitution in the spring of 1787, just a short time after the end of Shays Rebellion.


Thomas Jefferson, in describing the 55 men sent to attend the Constitutional Convention in Philadelphia, called the convention "an assembly of demigods." Indeed, the world had never seen such a collection of minds before in one location. Though they may not all have been equally qualified to attend the convention, in general the delegates were a snapshot of the 18th century upper crust. Statistics prove this; All were white men, mostly protestant with one or two Catholics and Quakers. Professionally, lawyers composed over a half of the group (34 out of the 55 delegates), while another quarter were planters owning 1,000 acres or more. Political life was also common to the delegates; all had held public office of some variety. Eight had been judges, three were governors of their respective states (four were former governors), 42 had served in Congress, and a handful were speakers of their state legislatures. These men had the history to back up their reputations as well: Eight had signed the Declaration of Independence, 30 had served in the Continental Army during the war, fifteen had survived true combat situations, and four had been on Washington's personal staff.

Enough with numbers; let's meet some of the real people who attended the convention.

George WashingtonGeorge Washington -- Virginia

Besides being the greatest hero of the Revolutionary War, he also served as the president of the Philadelphia Convention. At first, he did not even want to attend the convention; but since he was a national figure, he did not want the public to think he had lost faith in government. His presence helped the new constitution's ratification, as it was understood that Washington would become the first President.

James MadisonJames Madison -- Virginia

Though his name is not as well known as others, Madison probably had the most influence on the arrangement of the Federal government. Madison was the creator of the Virginia Plan, the system used as a basis for the structure of the national government. His meticulous notes tell us much of what we know today about the convention. Finally, Madison collaborated with Alexander Hamilton and John Jay in the writing of a series of articles in support of the new constitution. They were later collected in a book called The Federalist, the most comprehensive source of knowledge of the principles driving our nation.

Benjamin FranklinBenjamin Franklin -- Pennsylvania

Franklin didn't let old age and ailing health stop him from attending the convention. Like Washington, his tremendous reputation as a scholar and inventor gave an air of prestige to the convention. Near the end of the convention a speech written by Franklin was read aloud by James Wilson, as Franklin was too weak to read it himself. Though it did not convince all the delegates to sign the Constitution, its eloquence did have an effect on the delegates.

Alexander HamiltonAlexander Hamilton -- New York

An exercise in frustration is the best description of Hamilton's experience at the convention; the other New York delegates were directly opposed to him. When they left the convention, Hamilton was the only New York delegate left. With at least two delegates needed from New York for that state to have a vote, Hamilton no longer had a purpose. He left as well, but returned later to sign the Constitution.

James WilsonJames Wilson -- Pennsylvania

A rather talkative gentleman, James Wilson delivered 168 speeches to the assembly. He was originally from Scotland, and thus spoke with an accent. Wilson was one of the best lawyers in the nation, and his defenses of a strong national government were unequaled. Having a strong influence on the course of the Constitution, President Washington later appointed him a justice of the Supreme Court.

Other important delegates include:


Elbridge Gerry (Massachusetts)
George Mason (Virginia) - known as the Father of the Bill of Rights
Gouverneur Morris (Pennsylvania)
Robert Morris (Pennsylvania)
Edmund Randolph (Virginia)
Roger Sherman (Connecticut)


Virginia & New Jersey Plans

The Virginia Plan

Branches Three - legislative, executive, and judicial. The legislature was more powerful, as it chose people to serve in the executive and judicial branches.
Legislature Two houses (bicameral). The House of Representatives was elected by the people and the Senate was elected by the state legislatures. Both were represented proportionally.
Other
Powers
The legislature could regulate interstate trade, strike down laws deemed unconstitutional and use armed forces to enforce laws.
As mentioned in the dossiers file, James Madison was one of the prominent delegates to the Constitutional Convention. However, he was thinking about the convention before he even got there. It was clear at the time that the current government under the Articles of Confederation was just not cutting the mustard, and something had to be done to remedy the situation. So, he drafted a plan for a new national government, which was presented at the convention as "The Virginia Plan" (see table for details). Essentially, the Virginia Plan proposed a strong national government that could make and enforce laws, and collect taxes. The people would be governed by two governments - the state and national. A system such as this is known as a Federal system of government. Additionally, both houses of the legislature would feature proportional representation; basically, this means that the more people a state has, the more representatives it gets in the legislature. Clearly, larger states favored this plan.

The New Jersey Plan

Branches Three - legislative, executive, and judicial. The legislature appoints people to serve in the executive branch, and the executive branch selects the justices of the Supreme Court.
Legislature One house (unicameral). States would be represented equally, so all states had the same power.
Other
Powers
The national government could levy taxes and import duties, regulate trade, and state laws would be subordinate to laws passed by the national legislature.
Smaller states were pretty scared about it, though. If this plan passed, it would mean that smaller states would have almost no say in the government. The debate over the Virginia Plan grew quite heated, and finally the small states asked for time to draw up their own plan, known as the New Jersey Plan (see table for details). Its legislature only had one house which featured equal representation - each state gets the same number of representatives. This way, smaller states had the same power in the legislature as larger states.

Ultimately, the New Jersey Plan was rejected as a basis for a new constitution. It was really a continuation of the old style of government under the Articles of Confederation. However, some ideas from it were used in the new constitution. The Virginia Plan was used, but many delegates felt that any new government would need new powers and a new organization to exercise those powers fully.





Smoothing Out the Bumps - The Major Compromises

Imagine three or four dozen men in powdered wigs arguing with each other in a blisteringly hot building in Philadelphia; that's a pretty accurate description of most of the Constitutional Convention. The delegates disagreed on numerous issues, and the sweltering heat did not help ease their tempers. Still, they managed to put up with the conditions and come up with solutions to the many problems facing the new constitution.

Legislative Branch Woes

How could the framers make both small and large states happy with the national legislature? The problem puzzled the delegates to the Philadelphia Convention for weeks, until the delegates from Connecticut (Roger Sherman and Oliver Ellsworth) put their heads together and came up with a solution. Known as the Connecticut Compromise or Great Compromise, it took aspects from both the Virginia and New Jersey Plans to create a national legislature with both proportional and equal representation. Pennsylvania State HouseCongress would have two houses; the House of Representatives would be elected directly by the people, proportionally representative, and its members would serve for two years. The Senate would be elected by state legislatures, equally representative, and its members would serve for six years. Argued over bitterly, the Connecticut Compromise passed by one vote.

Additionally, the issue of slavery began to cause problems at the convention. The northern states were keenly interested in the regulation of interstate commerce; this would help their businesses run smoother. However, the southern states were opposed to it. The south also would reject any constitution that outlawed slavery; slaves had been a part of the colonies since their creation, and were considered property by slaveowners. To satisfy both sides, the delegates worked out a compromise: Congress would have the power to regulate commerce, but it could not interfere with the slave trade until 1808. It was also agreed that slaves would be counted as three fifths (3/5) of a person when determining how many representatives a state could send to the House of Representatives, and when computing taxes. Finally, the fugitive slave clause of Article IV provided that slaves who escaped to other states must be returned to their owners.

Executive Branch Enigmas

This was probably the biggest problem that faced the creators of the Constitution. Should there be more than one chief executive? How long should he serve for? How much power should the chief executive have? How should the chief executive be selected? All of these problems plagued the framers.

First, it was decided that there would only be one chief executive, the President; multiple executive officials might come into conflict. The length of term fluctuated between seven, six and four years, but the final decision was for four years, with no limit on the number of terms a President can serve. The current limit of 2 terms was set by the Twenty-second Amendment.

The powers of the President were a major sticking point. They definitely wanted to avoid too much power; the King George's power had been too great, and it lead to corruption and rebellion in the colonies. Too weak was also bad, as proven by the ineffectual government under the Articles of Confederation. A middle ground needed to be found. Finally, the delegates arrived at these conclusions:

  • The President can veto a bill passed by Congress. The bill can still become a law if both houses of Congress vote to override the President's veto.

  • Appointments to executive branch positions and federal judgeships can be made by the President, but they must be approved by the Senate. No member of Congress can simultaneously hold a position elsewhere in the federal government.

  • Treaties are similar; the President has the power to make them, but they must be approved by the Senate, with a two-thirds vote.

  • The President is the commander-in-chief of all the military forces, but only Congress can actually declare war. Congress also controls the funds that would allow the President to conduct war operations.

The rest of the President's powers are not defined. Why? The framers simply didn't know what the chief executive of the nation should be like. Garden MeetingMany of the creators trusted George Washington, who was practically guaranteed the Presidency, to `fill in the blanks' in the Constitution.

The election of the President was also an especially troubling issue. Truth be told, the framers didn't really trust any group to the choice of such an important person. No one - not the people, not Congress, not state legislatures - could satisfy them. So, they invented a new group, the electoral college. Though it's undergone some alterations since its first appearance, basically this system has worked successfully for over 200 years. It goes like this: The electoral college meets every four years to select the President. Each state has the same number of electors as it has Senators and Representatives in Congress. When the people vote, they don't actually vote for the President directly; instead, they vote for electors. The electors, in turn, vote for the President. Nowadays it's know ahead of time what Presidential candidate an elector will vote for, due to the influence of political parties.


Federalists and Anti-Federalists

The creation of the Constitution entailed hours of debate and compromise, and even when it was completed, some delegates were unhappy with it. The task of fixing the ailing Confederate government was not complete yet; each state had to ratify, or approve, the Constitution. Basically, people divided into two groups, the Federalists and the Anti-Federalists. Each of their viewpoints is worth examining, as they both have sound reasoning.

The Anti-Federalists did not want to ratify the Constitution. Basically, they argue that:

  • It gave too much power to the national government at the expense of the state governments.

  • There was no bill of rights.

  • The national government could maintain an army in peacetime.

  • Congress, because of the `necessary and proper clause,' wielded too much power.

  • The executive branch held too much power. Meeting Room

Of these complaints, the lack of a bill of rights was the most effective. The American people had just fought a war to defend their rights, and they did not want a intimidating national government taking those rights away again. The lack of a bill of rights was the focus of the Anti-Federalist campaign against ratification.

The Federalists, on the other hand, had answers to all of the Anti-Federalist complaints. Among them:

  • The separation of powers into three independent branches protected the rights of the people. Each branch represents a different aspect of the people, and because all three branches are equal, no one group can assume control over another.

  • A listing of rights can be a dangerous thing. If the national government were to protect specific listed rights, what would stop it from violating rights other than the listed ones? Since we can't list all the rights, the Federalists argued that it's better to list none at all.

Overall, the Federalists were more organized in their efforts. By June of 1788, the Constitution was close to ratification. Nine states had ratified it, and only one more (New Hampshire) was needed. To achieve this, the Federalists agreed that once Congress met, it would draft a bill of rights. Finally, New York and Virginia approved, and the Constitution was a reality. Interestingly, the Bill of Rights was not originally a part of the Constitution, and yet it has proved to be highly important to protecting the rights of the people.

The three most important words in the Constitution are "We the People." These words establish the source of power and consent being in the people themselves - those in authority rule based on the consent or permission of the governed and not by privilege, right, or force. The preamble to the Constitution also reveals the six goals of the Constitution itself:

We the People of the United States, (1)in Order to form a more perfect Union, (2)establish Justice, (3)insure domestic Tranquility, (4)provide for the common defence, (5)promote the general Welfare, and (6)secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.


America has done more to establish, preserve, and advance freedom than any other nation in history. America was the first nation to establish government, freedom, and liberty upon natural, God-given rights. The nation was founded and has championed the principles of freedom, absolute truth, equality of person, and equal justice under law based on a Christian worldview. America has offered and extended freedom to millions of people around the world and has given over a million of her citizens in death for freedom's sake. She has served as an inspiration, beacon and model to all those yearning to be free. America has given more humanitarian aid to people around the world than any other nation and has done more to advance the eternal ideals of freedom and liberty than any nation in history. America stands for the rights of all, equal justice for all under law, the rights of the individual, religious freedom and the value of all life. However, America is not perfect. In her history, she has committed four great national sins: 1. the removal of the American Indian from lands often in an unjust manner - America broke many of the promises given to the Indian. 2. the enslavement of African Americans in human bondage for 250 years 3. the killing of the unborn in abortion - since 1973, over 40 million children have been legally killed in the United States. 4. In the last 80 years, America has forgotten God, the greatest and most devastating sin of all. Interestingly, each of these sins relates to a misunderstanding and lack of appreciation concerning the value of each individual life and a forgetting of the Creator of life itself and His eternal principles.


If America was founded upon these eternal truths and the God who established them, what will happen to our nation when we move from that foundation and forget that God?


****Important Quotes**** (not on the test, but pick the two you like best and bring them to the midterm - If you write them in the bonus section of the test, you will receive extra points...)


“It is the eternal struggle between these two principles --right and wrong -- throughout the world. They are the two principles that have stood face to face from the beginning of time..." Abraham Lincoln


"At what point shall we expect the approach of danger? By what means shall we fortify against it? Shall we expect some transatlantic military giant, to step the Ocean, and crush us at a blow? Never! All the armies of Europe, Asia and Africa combined, with all the treasure of the earth (our own excepted) in their military chest; with a Bonaparte for a commander, could not by force, take a drink from the Ohio, or make a track on the Blue Ridge, in a trial of a thousand years. At what point, then, is the approach of danger to be expected? I answer, if it ever reach us it must spring up amongst us. It cannot come from abroad. If destruction be our lot, we must ourselves be its author and finisher. As a nation of freemen, we must live through all time, or die by suicide." Abraham Lincoln


"Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction. We didn't pass it to our children in the bloodstream. It must be fought for, protected, and handed on for them to do the same, or one day we will spend our sunset years telling our children and our children's children what it was once like in the United States where men were free." Ronald Reagan


"It cannot be emphasized too strongly or too often that this great nation was founded not by religionists but by Christians, not on religion but on the Gospel of Jesus Christ…. We shall not fight alone… God presides over the destinies of nations… The battle is not to the strong alone… Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery? Forbid it, ALMIGHTY GOD! Give me liberty or give me death!" Patrick Henry


"It is impossible to rightly govern the world without God and the Bible" President George Washington, September 17th, 1796


"Can the liberties of a nation be thought secure when we have removed their only firm basis, a conviction in the minds of the people that these liberties are the gift of God? That they are not to be violated but with His wrath? I tremble for my country when I reflect that God is just; that His justice cannot sleep forever." President Thomas Jefferson


"We have no government armed in power capable of contending in human passions unbridled by morality and religion. Our constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate for the government of any other." John Adams, address to the militia of Massachusetts, 1798.


"The highest story of the American Revolution is this: it connected in one indissoluble bond the principles of civil government with the principles of Christianity." President John Adams


"We've staked the whole future of American civilization not on the power of government, far from it. We have staked the future of all our political institutions upon the capacity of each and all of us . . . to Govern ourselves according to the commandments of God. The future and success of America is not in this Constitution, but in the laws of God upon which this Constitution is founded." President James Madison


"Before any man can be considered as a member of civil society, he must be considered as a subject of the Governor of the Universe. And to the same Divine Author of every good and perfect gift [James 1:17] we are indebted for all those privileges and advantages, religious as well as civil, which are so richly enjoyed in this favored land." James Madison


"Let the children...be carefully instructed in the principles and obligations of the Christian religion. This is the most essential part of education. The great enemy of the salvation of man, in my opinion, never invented a more effectual means of extirpating [removing] Christianity from the world than by persuading mankind that it was improper to read the Bible at schools." Benjamin Rush


"The general principles on which the fathers achieved independence were.... the general principles of Christianity." President John Quincy Adams

"If there is anything in my thoughts or style to commend, the credit is due to my parents for instilling in me an early love of the Scriptures. If we abide by the principles taught in the Bible, our country will go on prospering and to prosper; but if we and our posterity neglect its instructions and authority, no man can tell how sudden a catastrophe may overwhelm us and bury all our glory in profound obscurity." Daniel Webster


"It is extremely important to our nation , in a political as well as religious view , that all possible authority and influence should be given to the scriptures , for these furnish the best principles of civil liberty , and the most effectual support of republican government. The principles of all genuine liberty , and of wise laws and administrations are to be drawn from the Bible and sustained by it's authority.The man therefore who weakens or destroys the divine authority of that book may be accessory to all the public disorders which society is doomed to suffer...." Noah Webster


"The fundamental basis of this nation's law was given to Moses on the Mount. The fundamental basis of our Bill of Rights comes from the teaching we get from Exodus and St. Matthew, from Isaiah and St. Paul. I don't think we emphasize that enough these days. If we don't have the proper fundamental moral background, we will finally end up with a totalitarian government which does not believe in the right for anybody except the state." President Harry S. Truman.



"History fails to record a single precedent in which nations subject to moral decay have not passed into political and economic decline. There has been either a spiritual awakening to overcome the moral lapse, or a progressive deterioration to ultimate national disaster" General Douglas MacArthur



"Religion, morality, and knowledge, being necessary to good government and the happiness of mankind, schools and the means of education shall forever be encouraged."--Article III of the Northwest Ordinance of 1787.



"The general principles, on which the Fathers achieved independence, were . . . the general principles of Christianity."--John Adams, in a letter to Thomas Jefferson, June 28, 1813



"My own private judgment has long been (and every day's experience more and more confirms me in it)that government cannot long exist without an alliance with Religion to some extent, and that Christianity is indispensable to the true interests and solid foundation of all governments. . . . I know not, indeed, how any deep sense of moral obligation or accountableness can be expected to prevail in the community without a firm foundation of the great Christian truths."--Joseph Story, in a letter to Jasper Adams, May 14, 1833


"We have been the recipients of the choicest bounties of Heaven. We have been preserved these many years in peace and prosperity. We have grown in numbers, wealth and power as no other nation has ever grown. But we have forgotten God. . . . We have vainly imagined, in the deceitfulness of our hearts, that all these blessings were produced by some superior wisdom and virtue of our own. Intoxicated with unbroken success, we have become too self-sufficient to feel the necessity of redeeming and preserving grace, too proud to pray to the God that made us!"--Abraham Lincoln, "Proclamation Appointing a National Fast Day," March 30, 1863


"The First Amendment . . . does not say that in every and all respects there shall be a separation of Church and State. Rather, it studiously defines the manner, the specific ways, in which there shall be no concert or union or dependency one on the other. That is the common sense of the matter."--William O. Douglas, Associate Justice of the Sup. Court 1951




Monday, December 7, 2009

Reason Electoral College Was Founded

Why Was the Electoral College Created?




by Marc Schulman

The Electoral College was created for two reasons. The first purpose was to create a buffer between population and the selection of a President. The second as part of the structure of the government that gave extra power to the smaller states.

The first reason that the founders created the Electoral College is hard to understand today. The founding fathers were afraid of direct election to the Presidency. They feared a tyrant could manipulate public opinion and come to power. Hamilton wrote in the Federalist Papers:

It was equally desirable, that the immediate election should be made by men most capable of analyzing the qualities adapted to the station, and acting under circumstances favorable to deliberation, and to a judicious combination of all the reasons and inducements which were proper to govern their choice. A small number of persons, selected by their fellow-citizens from the general mass, will be most likely to possess the information and discernment requisite to such complicated investigations. It was also peculiarly desirable to afford as little opportunity as possible to tumult and disorder. This evil was not least to be dreaded in the election of a magistrate, who was to have so important an agency in the administration of the government as the President of the United States. But the precautions which have been so happily concerted in the system under consideration, promise an effectual security against this mischief.

(See All of the Federalist 68)

Hamilton and the other founders believed that the electors would be able to insure that only a qualified person becomes President. They believed that with the Electoral College no one would be able to manipulate the citizenry. It would act as check on an electorate that might be duped. Hamilton and the other founders did not trust the population to make the right choice. The founders also believed that the Electoral College had the advantage of being a group that met only once and thus could not be manipulated over time by foreign governments or others.


The electoral college is also part of compromises made at the convention to satisfy the small states. Under the system of the Electoral College each state had the same number of electoral votes as they have representative in Congress, thus no state could have less then 3. The result of this system is that in this election the state of Wyoming cast about 210,000 votes, and thus each elector represented 70,000 votes, while in California approximately 9,700,000 votes were cast for 54 votes, thus representing 179,000 votes per electorate. Obviously this creates an unfair advantage to voters in the small states whose votes actually count more then those people living in medium and large states.

One aspect of the electoral system that is not mandated in the constitution is the fact that the winner takes all the votes in the state. Therefore it makes no difference if you win a state by 50.1% or by 80% of the vote you receive the same number of electoral votes. This can be a recipe for one individual to win some states by large pluralities and lose others by small number of votes, and thus this is an easy scenario for one candidate winning the popular vote while another winning the electoral vote. This winner take all methods used in picking electors has been decided by the states themselves. This trend took place over the course of the 19th century.

While there are clear problems with the Electoral College and there are some advantages to it, changing it is very unlikely. It would take a constituitional amendment ratified by 3/4 of states to change the system. It is hard to imagine the smaller states agreeing. One way of modifying the system s to eliminate the winner take all part of it. The method that the states vote for the electoral college is not mandated by the consitution but is decided by the states. Two states do not use the winner take all system, Maine and Nebraska. It would be difficult but not impossible to get other states to change their systems, unfortunately the party that has the advantage in the state is unlikely to agree to a unilateral change.

Sunday, November 29, 2009

Homework for Week of 11/30 to Dec 7 - due Dec 7

"...something has happened in the last (eighty) years. The freedom that once was founded on a Biblical consensus and a Christian worldview has now become autonomous freedom, cut loose from all constraints. Here we have the world spirit of our age - autonomous man setting himself up as God, in defense of the knowledge and the moral and spiritual truth which God has given. Here is the reason why we have a moral breakdown in every area of life. The titanic freedoms which we once enjoyed have been cut loose from their Christian restraints and are becoming a force of destruction leading to chaos. And when this happens, there really are few alternatives. All morality becomes relative, law becomes arbitrary, and society moves toward disintegration. In personal and social life, compassion is swallowed up by self-interest...when the memory of the Christian consensus which gave us freedom within the Biblical form is increasingly forgotten, a manipulative authoritarian power will tend to fill the vacuum. At this point, the words "right" and "left" (politically) will make little difference. They are only two roads to the same end; the results will be the same. Overwhelming (state power) will gradually force form and order on society so that it will not sink into chaos - and most people will accept it." So are the words and thoughts of Francis Schaeffer, this time in his book, "The Great Evangelical Disaster" Quoting this statement in a recent article, Brannon Howse, president of "Worldview Weekend" concludes, "The chaos is now here, and politicians will seek to make it worse so they can justify bigger government, fewer freedoms for the people, and more power and wealth for the elite ruling class. Are Americans waking up too late? Are the numbers of Americans who understand the threat - or even care - too small? If the answer to these two questions is yes, then the only question left to ask is what will happen to those of us that refuse to accept it? If America's fate is sealed, then this one thing I know: future generations will ask...Where were the people of the churches? Why did they let that happen? Why did they compromise?... In standing for what is just, righteous, and true, we are standing for Jesus Christ because justice, righteousness, and truth are reflections of His character and nature. This is a powerful witness for the unsaved and unbelieving world. Even in the face of death, the world will see that we are so committed to the cause of Christ that we are willing to lay down our lives for Him."

Written project Due Dec 14 - See last HW blog for instructions...

Quiz on Dec 14 on US Constitution - no study guide will be given...You are to rely on your notes for studying, so be diligent in your note taking!!

Catch up on past HW not completed and do Extra Credit!!!

The Manhattan Declaration is a document recently put out by religious leaders concerning Abortion, Marriage, Religious Liberty, and Unjust Laws and Civil Disobedience. Many have signed the document in support, but some Christians have chosen not to sign it.

1. Click on http://manhattandeclaration.org/ Read the intro on the home page, then click on "Download a summary of the Manhattan Declaration on the right side of the page (If you want to read the entire document also, there is a link for that as well) and read the summary.

2. Click on the sites below and read the articles. The first is from a Christian leader who has chosen not to sign the document. The second is from a leader who has chosen to sign. The third is a summary of both sides of the argument.

http://www.gty.org/Resources/Articles/A390

http://www.albertmohler.com/2009/11/23/why-i-signed-the-manhattan-declaration/

http://www.worldviewtimes.com/article.php/articleid-5634/Brannon-Howse/Jan-Markell

3. Write a one page opinion paper (front of one page or more), stating whether YOU would sign the document and explain why or why not. You will be graded not on your choice, but on your ability to express your views and support your choice. Think carefully before answering and use the articles for ideas in addition to what we have discussed in class and your beliefs from your own worldview beliefs.

Sunday, November 15, 2009

Homework 11/16 - 11/30 Due 11/30

TO ALL STUDENTS -- CHANGES IN ANNOUNCED PLANS -- PLEASE TAKE NOTE: 1. DUE TO A LACK OF RESPONSE, GETTYSBURG TRIP WILL BE RESCHEDULED FOR A DIFFERENT TIME...I KNOW THIS IS A BUSY TIME OF YEAR, SO WE WILL TRY TO DO SOMETHING AFTER THE FIRST OF THE YEAR 2. THERE WILL BE NO QUIZ ON NOV 30 -- QUIZ WILL BE RESCHEDULED FOR DEC. 14. 3. MIDTERM WILL BE GIVEN ON FIRST CLASS AFTER CHRISTMAS BREAK. MIDTERM WILL BE 80 QUESTIONS AND TWO ESSAY QUESTIONS. STUDY GUIDE WILL BE PROVIDED. 4. PROJECTS ARE STILL DUE ON DEC 14. 5. ORAL PRESENTATIONS ON NEW BOOK, "A CONVERSATION WITH C.S. LEWIS" WILL BEGIN IN MID JANUARY. PLEASE PURCHASE BOOK AND BEGIN READING. 6. IMPORTANT!! PLEASE COMPLETE ALL HOMEWORK BELOW (ONE ADDITIONAL ASSIGNMENT HAS BEEN ADDED FOR THIS WEEK - PLEASE TAKE NOTE AND COMPLETE) AND CATCH UP ON ANY HW YOU HAVE NOT TURNED IN -- THERE ARE ASSIGNMENTS STILL OUTSTANDING FOR SOME AND POINTS TO BE GOTTEN -- ALSO TAKE ADVANTAGE OF EXTRA CREDIT POINTS. IF YOU ARE UNSURE IF YOU HAVE OUTSTANDING ASSIGNMENTS, PLEASE E-MAIL ME AND I WILL BE GLAD TO LET YOU KNOW. 7. HAVE A GREAT THANKSGIVING.


Fact to consider...The shift from a Christian/Reformation worldview to a Humanist one began to occur in Germany, the home of reformer Martin Luther, with the higher criticism of the authority of Scripture and the questioning of absolute truth beginning in the 1850's... Then, after eight decades, roughly 85 years, of economic,political, social, religious, and military upheaval, the German people WILLINGLY CHOSE to give away the 400 years of religious and political freedoms they had enjoyed for the absolute power and authority of Adolf Hitler. When did the same shift in worldviews begin in earnest in the United States?...Our next lesson will reveal the answer...

Read Chapter 10, the last chapter of "A Christian Manifesto" and answer the following questions

1. What does Schaeffer say has been used as a tool to force the false secular humanist worldview and it's results on everyone? _________________________
2 -8 List the seven key points Schaeffer notes to summarize his manifesto.
9. Schaeffer says it is the responsibility of those holding the Christian worldview to show _____________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________
10. The manifesto ends with two separate Bible passages from Isaiah 59:12-16 and Revelation 3:2. Read the passages carefully and write a brief explanation, stating why you feel Schaeffer chose these passages to end his book.
_____________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________

Read the article on the link below from the Barna Research Group - this is a VERY interesting look at current worldviews in America, especially among those who claim to be Christian. This article will probably anger or upset you with it's findings, but I believe all believers today must know the impact that the humanist worldview has had on our nation and the church and how much needs to be done to turn our churches and nation back to a Biblical worldview. Write a summary of the article, telling me the three statistics or facts that impacted you the most and why. The Barna site has many excellent articles - read and write a brief summary on as many as you want - extra credit will be given for any additional articles at any time moving forward.

http://www.barna.org/barna-update/article/21-transformation/252-barna-survey-examines-changes-in-worldview-among-christians-over-the-past-13-years


Go to link below and read the article "Without God There is No Law" Write a brief summary of the article, expessing what you thin are the three main points the writer is trying to get across. After reading the article, are you more optimistic or pessimistic about the future of the Christian worldview in America?

http://www.americanvision.org/article/without-god-there-is-no-law/

Read the following essay at the link below about earthly and spiritual high ground. Do you think the author's comparison is a valid one? Why or Why not?


http://neumyshare.blogspot.com/2009/10/holding-high-ground.html

NOTE: I ADDED THIS ASSIGNMENT ON 11/23 - PLEASE COMPLETE AND TURN IN NEXT WEEK

Go to site below and read the recent major decisions of the Supreme Court on vital issues. Notice how many votes are 5-4 decisions. Read each decision and write down the case and whether you agree with the majority position and why or why not. We will discuss these cases in class and dig into the legal reasoning and worldview connections...

http://www.law.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/Ftrials/conlaw/landmarkvotes.html









Continue working on your projects due 12/14. From books, newspapers, magazines, websites, or other sources, choose 10 articles that relate to worldview, religion, freedom, government, social issues, rights, etc...The articles can be about current issues (abortion, religious freedom, gun control, capital punishment, right to bear arms, same-sex marriage, victim's rights, national security, law enforcement, etc) or about historical issues/events (founding of the nation, civil rights issues in the civil war or WW II, slavery, segregation and discrimination, Scopes Trial, public education, etc) After reading ten articles, write a 3+ page paper explaining the content of each article, how it relates to the issues of government/law and worldview, and what your personal opinions are on the topic. Be SURE to back up your personal opinions with facts that support your belief. IF YOU"D LIKE TO PICK ONE TOPIC AND DO THE ENTIRE PAPER ON IT OR ANY NUMBER OF TOPICS BETWEEN 1 AND 10, THAT IS OK AS LONG AS YOU STILL HAVE TEN DIFFERENT ARTICLES OR SOURCES TOTAL IN YOUR BIBLIOGRAPHY.
Include a cover page and bibliography (not included in the 3+ pages)




EXTRA CREDIT on Upcoming Terrorist Trials

Go to the c-span link below and click on "Fmr. Atty. Gen. Michael Mukasey Remarks at Federalist Society Lawyers Convention". Watch the video and write a brief summary of the comments and opinions of Mr. Mukasey. Why do you think this is such an important issue and what points do you put forth to support your opinion. You may use any notes or thoughts you have from class on 11/16 as we will have discussed this issue then as well.

http://www.c-span.org/Watch/watch.aspx?MediaId=HP-A-25694

The following link shows a Senate hearing today involving Attorney General Eric Holder answering questions regarding the decision to try 9-11 terrorists in civilian couts in NY - very interesting, particularly the last 25 minutes or so. Watch and write a brief summary for extra credit

http://www.c-span.org/Watch/Media/2009/11/18/HP/R/26128/Atty+General+Holder+Responds+to+Critics+on+Guantanamo+Bay.aspx

Thursday, November 5, 2009

Homework for week of 11/9 - due 11/16

Because of the videos, it may take a little longer than normal to complete the homework. Please take note of that and don't wait until the last minute - it will make things tougher for you...Please complete the assignment entirely (extra credit optional of course)


Trip to Gettysburg is possible on Sat Nov 28. Check with parents to see if you can make it on that date. If most can make it, we will leave St. Tim's at 8:30 am and return around 6 pm. Cost should be no more than $10-$15 per person. We will need some parents to go along as drivers/chaperones - please let me know by next Monday Nov 16 if you can attend and if you can "provide a parent"



FIRST HALF PROJECT REMINDER (due on last class before Christmas break)

From books, newspapers, magazines, websites, or other sources, choose 10 articles that relate to worldview, religion, freedom, government, social issues, rights, etc...The articles can be about current issues (abortion, religious freedom, gun control, capital punishment, right to bear arms, same-sex marriage, victim's rights, national security, law enforcement, etc) or about historical issues/events (founding of the nation, civil rights issues in the civil war or WW II, slavery, segregation and discrimination, Scopes Trial, public education, etc) After reading ten articles, write a 3+ page paper explaining the content of each article, how it relates to the issues of government/law and worldview, and what your personal opinions are on the topic. Be SURE to back up your personal opinions with facts that support your belief. In addition to the ten articles, you must have at least five other sources. Include a cover page and bibliography (not included in the 3+ pages)



Remember your projects due Dec 14. Next quiz Nov 30. Study guide will be posted beginning Nov 23.


Read the following article and write a brief summary of the main points and your opinion of the article.


The Uniqueness of the American Experiment (Peter Marshall Ministries)

In 1776, the Founding Fathers of the United States made an extraordinary announcement to the rest of the world. In the most famous written paragraph in American history, Thomas Jefferson, author of the Declaration of Independence, wrote:

"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, and endowed by their Creator with certain inalienable rights, among these life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness."

Why do I call this "an extraordinary announcement"? Because this was the only time in human history that a nation's government was founded on a creed, a statement of faith, a profession of belief.

The Declaration of Independence is the statement of America's founding ideals, a vision statement, if you will, that is utterly unique in world history.

Further, this uniquely American contribution to the history of humanity: the belief that all men are created equal, is the bedrock of our civilization.

Any progress we Americans have made through the centuries in creating a society of liberty and justice for all has come by the application of this self-evident truth to the way we Americans live with each other.

At the time of every great social crisis in our history this question has been at the heart of the conflict:

Do we truly believe that all men are created equal, or are these just empty words and political window-dressing?

This issue was the pivotal issue of the American Revolution, the struggle against slavery, the women's movement, the Civil Rights movement, and is now at the center of the pro-life movement.

This is why I believe that the Declaration needs to have a pre-eminent place in the teaching of history to our children -- because this idea of human equality has literally created American history.

Down through the centuries the American people have always believed that any public policy that robs some people of their basic equality with other people is fundamentally wrong.

Notice that Thomas Jefferson said that these announced truths were "self-evident."

What he meant was that it was not just the Founding Fathers themselves that believed all men are created equal -- it was pervasive throughout the American colonies.

That means that this was an "uh-huh" statement -- everybody knew this. Jefferson said that he was not trying "to say things which had not been said before, but to place before mankind the common sense of the subject."

How could the Founding Fathers say these truths were self-evident? What shaped their thinking?

James Otis, the orator of the American Revolution, wrote that government

"has an ever-lasting foundation in the unchangeable will of God, the author of nature, whose laws never vary . . . There can be no prescription old enough to supersede the law of nature, and the grant of God Almighty, who has given all men a natural right to be free."(1)

Alexander Hamilton:

"The sacred rights of mankind are not to be rummaged for among parchments and musty records. They are written, as with a sunbeam, in the whole volume of human nature, by the hand of the Divinity itself, and can never be erased or obscured by mortal power."(2)

Samuel Adams:

"The right of freedom being the gift of God Almighty, it is not in the power of man to alienate this gift."(3)

Thomas Jefferson asserted that the only basis for American freedoms was the conviction among the people that "these liberties are the gift of God."(4)

There are so many other similar quotes from the Founding Fathers that it is obvious beyond contradiction that they structured American government on the basis of the natural rights of mankind, which they firmly believed are the gift of God.

Equally obvious is the fact that these beliefs were not exclusive to them -- they were shared by the vast majority of colonial Americans.

Some historians like to lump together the American and French Revolutions, since they both were based on the natural rights of mankind. But, the uniqueness of the Declaration of Independence as the basis of American government is seen in the fact that at no point in either of the French declarations of "the rights of man" is there any statement that these rights derive from God.

Perry Miller, the late dean of Puritan history at Harvard, was fond of decrying what he termed the "obtuse secularism"(5) of those who, in LSU Professor Ellis Sandoz's words,

"approach the founding as a merely rationalistic enterprise of men preoccupied with the European Enlightenment's progressive notions and contemptuous of traditional religion."(6)

Miller insisted that Protestant Christianity was at the heart of the American Revolution. In his famous essay, From the Covenant to the Revival, Professor Miller wrote that

"The basic fact is that the Revolution had been preached to the masses as a religious revival, and had the astonishing fortune to succeed."(7)

Most historians agree that one simply cannot properly teach the history of America's founding period unless the impact of the First Great Awakening is taken into account.

Why? Because this explosive revival, which began in the 1720's in New Jersey, and carried the colonies through the Revolution and the establishment of our new government, was characterized by preaching that stressed the equality of mankind, thereby strongly promoting American democratic beliefs.

For instance, the preaching of George Whitefield, the best-known evangelist of the age, who gave over 18,000 sermons from Maine to Georgia, and, according to Ben Franklin, drew 10,000 people to Market Square in Philadelphia, emphasized that God is no respecter of persons, meaning that He pays no attention to people's social status, and that all alike must surrender to Christ and receive salvation from Him.

This democratic and leveling impact of the evangelical pulpit that helped the American people revolt against the social and political tyranny being waged by a corrupt British aristocracy cannot be overestimated.

The message was unmistakably clear: the only legitimate government in both Church and State, in the sight of Him who made all men equal, is that which governs by the consent of the governed.

The contrast between an American people that deeply believed that all men are created equal and the aristocratic and tyrannous attitudes of an elitist British government could not possibly have been more stark.

The Founding Fathers' belief in human equality came from the teachings of Reformer John Calvin on civil government, the teachings of English Puritans on civil government, and Scottish Presbyterian Samuel Rutherford's important 1744 work Lex, Rex, (the law is king) - thoroughly familiar to the Founding Fathers, in which he wrote that "all are born alike and equal."(8)

The importance of religion to the Founding Fathers in the Continental Congress is further seen in the fact that the Congress called for 16 separate days of prayer and fasting, or thanksgiving and prayer, depending on the progress of the war, during the five years of its duration.

For example, on December 11, 1776, the colonists were:

"to reverence the Providence of God . . . and beg the countenance of his Providence in the prosecution of the present just and necessary war."(9)

Their language here was not just some kind of religious boilerplate. So concerned were they about the moral and spiritual lives of the soldiers that on June 30, 1775, the Continental Congress decreed:

"It is earnestly recommended to all officers and soldiers diligently to attend Divine service; and all officers and soldiers who shall behave indecently or irreverently at any place of Divine worship, shall . . . be brought before a court martial."(10)

It is not possible to accurately teach American history without taking into account the religious motivations and worldview of those who discovered this continent, settled the original colonies, fought for our independence from Britain, and established our government.

The sharing of that Bible-based worldview on the part of both the people and their political leadership during the founding period meant that there was fundamental agreement on the self-evident truths that motivated the struggle for independence and the founding of our government.

Americans still believe that all men are equal before God and before the law; we still believe that these human beings who are created equal are endowed by their Creator with unalienable rights to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness; we still believe that governments exist primarily to secure these rights; we still believe that the authority of government rests only on the consent of the governed, and that if the government loses that consent, the people have the right to alter or abolish it.

These self-evident truths of the Declaration of Independence that are the basis for American government are still unique among the nations to this very hour.

Let us teach our children the uniqueness of America -- that this is a godly experiment in self-government that has no equal in all of human history.

Let us pass on to them a love of this great nation; and let us lay on their hearts a sense of duty and responsibility to ensure that this experiment succeeds, that what Lincoln called "the last, best hope of earth" does not fail, and that Lady Liberty's torch in New York Harbor is never allowed to go dark.


READ SCHAEFFER CHAPTER 9 AND ANSWER THE QUESTIONS BELOW

1. Schaeffer states that there comes a time when force is appropriate, but it should be in the ______________________posture.

2. He gives two historical examples of using force in self defense. name them ____________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________

3. Schaeffer states that a current issue is crucial for the future of the church in the United States - what is that issue? _______________________________________

4. Read Dr. William Barker's view on the role of civil disobedience in connection with that critical issue on pg. 119. Do you agree with Dr. barker's view? Why or why not?
__________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________

5. Schaeffer notes a belief system called liberation theology. Define liberation theology. What other worldviews is it similar to or connected with? ___________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________

6. Schaeffer states on Pg 125-126 that we have a duty to use our possessions with _________________.

7. He states that because the church has failed to do this, many make the mistake of equating the _________________________ with a ______________________.

8. On pg 126, Schaeffer states that the founders believed that there was a 'bottom line' principle that had to be believed and acted upon so that the state could never become all powerful and take the place of God. Read carefully. What is that 'bottom line principle?
_______________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________

9. The Declaration states that the people, if they find that there rights are being attaked and taken away by the state, have a duty to __________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________

10. What was the "black regiment" and why was it important? ________________________
___________________________________________________________________________

11. What helped to "sow the seeds" (prepare the way for) of the American Revolution? Explain how so. (pg 128-129) ______________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________

12. Define autonomous ____________________________________________________

13. After reading the conclusion to the chapter, explain why, in Schaeffer's opinion, there must be a "bottom line" or a final place for civil disobedience. ______________________
________________________________________________________________________

14. If there is no place for civil disobedience, then the _______________ has been put in the place of God.

15. The early Christians in New Testament times performed their acts of civil disobedience even ___________________________________________________________________

Look up the following names and write a BRIEF paragraph on them:

16. John Bunyan -
"If you release me today, I will preach tomorrow"

17. The "Tank man" of Tiananmen Square, China - "the unknown voice of millions"

18. Angelina Grimke -
I recognize no rights but human rights -- I know nothing of men's rights and women's rights; for in Christ Jesus there is neither male nor female. It is my solemn conviction that, until this principal of equality is recognized and embodied in practice, the church can do nothing effectual for the permanent reformation of the world.

19.
Mordecai Anielewicz - 'Who will write our history? Who will tell our story?"

20. Raoul Wallenberg - "100,000 people owe him their lives."

21. Simon Wiesenthal - “What connects two thousand years of genocide? Too much power in too few hands.” “There is no denying that Hitler and Stalin are alive (even) today... they are waiting for us to forget, because this is what makes possible the resurrection of these two monsters.”

22. Medgar Evers - "You can kill a man but you can't kill an idea."

23. Ralph McGill - "the desire for individual dignity and freedom . . . is in the genes of all mankind."







Copy and paste to Go to the c-span site below and click on "House Floor Debate on Health Care - The Stupak Amendment" on the left of the page. Despite the voice vote at the end of the debate, a recorded vote was done and the amendment to restrict the use of federal funds for abortion was passed by a vote of 240-194. Many still oppose the bill on other grounds and many are concerned that as the process goes forward, the amendment will be taken back out of the final bill. Listen to the debate and write a brief summary of your opinion of how the debate was conducted and what was said. Choose two speakers, one you agreed with and one you did not agree with and write a brief note about them, explaining your opinions of the issue and of what they said.

http://www.c-span.org/Health-Care-House-Debate.aspx


Copy and paste to Go to the c-span site below and click on "Justices Scalia and Breyer on the Constitution at the top of the page. Watch the discussion the two justices have regarding how they interpret the Constitution. Listen carefully to the discussion and write a brief opinion on which justice's philosophy and opinions you agree with most and why.

http://www.c-span.org/Watch/Media/2009/10/31/AC/R/24809/Justices+Scalia+Breyer+on+the+Constitution.aspx

EXTRA CREDIT

Visit the site below and click on "select a topic" on the right hand side of the page and write a brief summary of what you learned about three separate topics and it's relationship to the Constitution. (Do more than three for extra extra credit)

http://ratify.constitutioncenter.org/constitution/index_no_flash.php